Looks like the Fed needs a TFR against itself!

A forum for the proverbial airport bum who just wants to talk about anything and everything related to flying. Introduce yourself here !!

Post Reply
User avatar
Brantel
Class B
Posts: 1029
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:23 pm
Location: Newport, TN

Looks like the Fed needs a TFR against itself!

Post by Brantel »

Looks like the tide turned on the Feds today!!!!
Brantel (Brian Chesteen),
RV12-IS, #121606, N912BC - Building Now!
RV10, #41942, N????? - Project Sold
RV-7/TU, #72823, N159SB - SOLD

User avatar
cjensen
Whiskey Victor
Posts: 5275
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:36 pm
Location: Green Bay, WI

Post by cjensen »

Yeah, that was a BONEHEADED move...I hadn't heard much about it yesterday, but it's all the rage this morning!

:roll: :bang:
Chad Jensen
Missing my RV-7...
Vertical Power support
920.216.3699
http://verticalpower.com

Spike
Chief Rivet Banger
Posts: 4013
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:40 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Post by Spike »

*snicker* Pretty easy to do isn't it boys?

I have mixed emotions about it though to be honest. I see both sides of the story. I am not sure I agree with the notion that a city's Mayor has to give permission before something happens in the federally controlled airspace above the city.

Now, on the human side, there wasn't much though put into what they were doing. Some other city it might have been a no biggie, but Manhattan? :dunno: :headscratch:
http://www.rivetbangers.com - Now integrating web and mail!
Current Build: 2 years into a beautiful little girl

User avatar
cjensen
Whiskey Victor
Posts: 5275
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:36 pm
Location: Green Bay, WI

Post by cjensen »

I completely agree with you Spike...the mayor has no authority on this, and saying that if he would've known, he would've told them no...??? Don't think so... :notcool:

If I lived there, however, I would've felt the same I'm sure...I woulda run for cover!

:o
Chad Jensen
Missing my RV-7...
Vertical Power support
920.216.3699
http://verticalpower.com

User avatar
4kilo
RB's First
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:32 am
Location: GPM (Grand Prairie, Texas)
Contact:

Post by 4kilo »

The real problem is just communication: If someone had told the people on the ground what was happening ahead of time there would have been no panic (or reason for panic).

Pat
RV-8
N804PT - IO-360, Hartzell blended airfoil, GRT dual Horizon I & EIS, TruTrak ADI Pilot II
Flying - 950 hours!

User avatar
TomNativeNewYorker
Class D
Posts: 439
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: KSAV

Post by TomNativeNewYorker »

Is there restricted airspace around Liberty Island or NYC that the VC-25A would have needed special permission to do the flyby?

User avatar
newtech
Class E
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:02 pm
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Post by newtech »

TomNativeNewYorker wrote:Is there restricted airspace around Liberty Island or NYC that the VC-25A would have needed special permission to do the flyby?
Basically, the U.S. Air Force can fly pretty much where ever it wants to. With the F-16 fighter escort, do we know that the VC-25A wasn't actually able to use the call sign Air Force One?
Steve Eberhart, W9BOJ
3EV - Evansville, IN
Where is Steve and the Sky Terrier
RV-7A Slider, O-360 A1A, Catto 3 blade, New Panel with Garmin G3X and 696, Icom A210, Bionics APRS. FLYING since June 24, 2009

airguy
Class E
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:41 pm
Contact:

Post by airguy »

newtech wrote:Basically, the U.S. Air Force can fly pretty much where ever it wants to. With the F-16 fighter escort, do we know that the VC-25A wasn't actually able to use the call sign Air Force One?
The aircraft (there are multiples) only use the callsign Airforce One when the president is aboard. Any other time they use a different callsign. Same applies to the helicopters he uses for short transport, it is Marine One only while the president is aboard.
Greg Niehues
Midland, TX
RV9A - finishing - 90% done, 90% to go
http://websites.expercraft.com/airguy/
Building a 9A with too much fuel and too much engine - should drop dead any minute now. :roll:

DanH
Class G
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:46 am

Post by DanH »

The root problem is the unthinking (and dangerous) inclination toward "secrecy" so prevalent in government these days. Why was there any need to keep this flight secret?

They could have just as easily done a press release for the AM news; "The aircraft known to the public as Air Force One will make a low pass down the Hudson this morning and circle the Statue of Liberty, complete with fighter escort. The Air Force says it is all part of a training mission." Half the citizens of New York would have lined the river to wave flags.
Dan Horton
RV8 QB
Barrett IO-390

airguy
Class E
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:41 pm
Contact:

Post by airguy »

DanH wrote:The root problem is the unthinking (and dangerous) inclination toward "secrecy" so prevalent in government these days. Why was there any need to keep this flight secret?

They could have just as easily done a press release for the AM news; "The aircraft known to the public as Air Force One will make a low pass down the Hudson this morning and circle the Statue of Liberty, complete with fighter escort. The Air Force says it is all part of a training mission." Half the citizens of New York would have lined the river to wave flags.
And there lies the problem - you might have one nutjob with a homemade antiaircraft gun or missile trying to take it out as a visible symbol.
Greg Niehues
Midland, TX
RV9A - finishing - 90% done, 90% to go
http://websites.expercraft.com/airguy/
Building a 9A with too much fuel and too much engine - should drop dead any minute now. :roll:

Bob Barrett
Class C
Posts: 625
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Sartell MN

There are still some terrost's left also.

Post by Bob Barrett »

Although most of my money would be bet on a local nut job trying to bring down Air Force One or its facsimile, not all of the bad guys are in Iraq or Afganstan. It would sure Osma Bin Laden a lot to brag about if they could claim to have taken down Air Force One. Frankly I think it was not a bright idea to fly over any city low and slow with or without a fighter escort!

User avatar
painless
Class C
Posts: 701
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 12:42 pm
Location: Peshtigo, Wisconsin

Post by painless »

I have one question. Doesn't the US Airforce know about photoshop???
Jeff Orear
RV6A N782P
Hatz Classic, Welding fuselage
Hatz build log. https://eaabuilderslog.org/?blproject&p ... GNCwv&sid=
Peshtigo, WI

User avatar
TomNativeNewYorker
Class D
Posts: 439
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: KSAV

Post by TomNativeNewYorker »

newtech wrote:
TomNativeNewYorker wrote:Is there restricted airspace around Liberty Island or NYC that the VC-25A would have needed special permission to do the flyby?
Basically, the U.S. Air Force can fly pretty much where ever it wants to.
Since I do not fly, can you clarify the procedures for me? Any air force(or military) flight does not have to file a flight plan, get permission to take off, nor check in or follow instructions from air traffic control? I was under the impression that the military only had control in 'military ops areas'

And let me rephrase the original question........Is there restricted airspace around Liberty Island or NYC that ANY aircraft would need special permission to do a flyby?

User avatar
Thermos
Class D
Posts: 328
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 7:26 pm
Location: KASH
Contact:

Post by Thermos »

TomNativeNewYorker wrote:Since I do not fly, can you clarify the procedures for me? Any air force(or military) flight does not have to file a flight plan, get permission to take off, nor check in or follow instructions from air traffic control? I was under the impression that the military only had control in 'military ops areas'
If a military aircraft is participating in the US air traffic control system, they follow the rules like everyone else. And even in military restricted airspace, there's often a lot of coordination going on between DoD air traffic controllers and the FAA.
TomNativeNewYorker wrote:....Is there restricted airspace around Liberty Island or NYC that ANY aircraft would need special permission to do a flyby?
I haven't flown the Hudson River corridor in awhile, but I'm pretty sure that the only airspace controls there are the LaGuardia/Kennedy/Newark Class B/C airspaces. No restricted/prohibited airspace, but there's some National Park Service "please don't fly below 2000 ft" airspace around the Statue of Liberty and Ellis Island.

Dave
Dave Setser
Avionics, Firewall Forward
http://www.mightyrv.com
Putting the "slow" in slow-build since 2004

Spike
Chief Rivet Banger
Posts: 4013
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:40 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Post by Spike »

airguy wrote: And there lies the problem - you might have one nutjob with a homemade antiaircraft gun or missile trying to take it out as a visible symbol.
Such is the price of our liberties. Some nutjob could do the same thing with a homemade potato gun launching anything he desires, in any city, any state, at anyone.

The price we pay for our liberties here is the reality that anyone at anytime could snuff our lives out on a whim. I am not aiming this comment at you airguy, but our society has turned into a bunch of pansies that insist on "pretending" that we are safe and immune from evil people merely because we make laws and pretend to be civil.

Spike
http://www.rivetbangers.com - Now integrating web and mail!
Current Build: 2 years into a beautiful little girl

User avatar
Brantel
Class B
Posts: 1029
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:23 pm
Location: Newport, TN

Post by Brantel »

Amen,

The only way anyone can cause mass panic and damage is to get into an airplane and cause terror...

All airplanes should be banned!!!!

No that is not a good idea so lets spend billions on security and torture all the people moving thru airports (and limit all General Aviation activities) in an effort to protect humanity from the nut cases.

If we do that all the nut cases will go away...correct?

Oh, wait, the Feds don't have to live by their own rules so who is going to protect us from them?

Monday I was driving on the Huntington Beach coastal hwy when I got a call from my wife. I was on the cell for about a minute when a traffic cop mounted on a motorcycle saw me, he ran thru a red light, bobbed and weaved between traffic, came close to running over a pedestrian, and snaked up between two cars all to stop me and tell me I can't talk and drive at the same time.

Glad he was there to keep everyone safe from my inability to do two things at once. :|
Spike wrote:
airguy wrote: And there lies the problem - you might have one nutjob with a homemade antiaircraft gun or missile trying to take it out as a visible symbol.
Such is the price of our liberties. Some nutjob could do the same thing with a homemade potato gun launching anything he desires, in any city, any state, at anyone.

The price we pay for our liberties here is the reality that anyone at anytime could snuff our lives out on a whim. I am not aiming this comment at you airguy, but our society has turned into a bunch of pansies that insist on "pretending" that we are safe and immune from evil people merely because we make laws and pretend to be civil.

Spike
Brantel (Brian Chesteen),
RV12-IS, #121606, N912BC - Building Now!
RV10, #41942, N????? - Project Sold
RV-7/TU, #72823, N159SB - SOLD

User avatar
TomNativeNewYorker
Class D
Posts: 439
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: KSAV

Post by TomNativeNewYorker »

Thermos wrote:
TomNativeNewYorker wrote:Since I do not fly, can you clarify the procedures for me? Any air force(or military) flight does not have to file a flight plan, get permission to take off, nor check in or follow instructions from air traffic control? I was under the impression that the military only had control in 'military ops areas'
If a military aircraft is participating in the US air traffic control system, they follow the rules like everyone else. And even in military restricted airspace, there's often a lot of coordination going on between DoD air traffic controllers and the FAA.
Thats what I thought, but an earlier post near the beginning of the thread was leading me to believe that the USAF had carte blanche to do whatever they choose to do in the airways. I have workd on military aircraft since the mid-eighties, but once they taxi from our flight line, I dont have a clue as to how what operational procedures they have to follow.
TomNativeNewYorker wrote:....Is there restricted airspace around Liberty Island or NYC that ANY aircraft would need special permission to do a flyby?
Thermos wrote: I haven't flown the Hudson River corridor in awhile, but I'm pretty sure that the only airspace controls there are the LaGuardia/Kennedy/Newark Class B/C airspaces. No restricted/prohibited airspace, but there's some National Park Service "please don't fly below 2000 ft" airspace around the Statue of Liberty and Ellis Island.

Dave
I thought after 9/11 I heard restrictions were enacted, but I just dont remember.

Post Reply