QB or SB?

A forum for the proverbial airport bum who just wants to talk about anything and everything related to flying. Introduce yourself here !!

What are you building?

Quick Build
2
10%
Standard Build
18
86%
Combination
1
5%
 
Total votes: 21

1:1_Scale
Class D
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Central Oregon

QB or SB?

Post by 1:1_Scale »

Just wondering what path everyone is taking and why? I initially was planning on the QB route, but since I want to pay for everything (except maybe the engine) out of pocket, I have been thinking the SB route may be better. More building time = more time to make & save the money for everything else required for the plane. I also think I would enjoy watching the structure come together, although I know there's going to be some tedious times involved there :wink:
Kelly
RV-7 Empennage done, wings done, fuselage to QB stage
1947 Stinson108-1 flying

User avatar
captain_john
Sparky
Posts: 5880
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:17 am
Location: KPYM

Post by captain_john »

I went SB for a couple or a few reasons.

Early in the game (and arguably still) I was clueless and didn't know what I wanted or needed.

The SB gave me the time to think about it and allowed me to save some money in the meanwhile to make the plane of my dreams.

Now, I am glad I went SB as I am just now, after 2.5 years of building getting a focus on exactly what I want for bells and whistles.

I think about the loot I saved and the experience I gained and I feel really good about my decision.

My $0.02...

:) CJ
RV-7
Garmin G3X with VP-X & a TMX-IO-360 with G3i
It's all over but the flying! 800+ hours in only 3 years!

User avatar
cjensen
Whiskey Victor
Posts: 5275
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:36 pm
Location: Green Bay, WI

Post by cjensen »

Standard all the way! Why? Money first of all. Second, after building the tail, I LOVE building, and a QB takes A LOT away.

You will fly sooner though!

:wink:
Chad Jensen
Missing my RV-7...
Vertical Power support
920.216.3699
http://verticalpower.com

User avatar
svanarts
Air Marshall
Posts: 1512
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 5:19 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Post by svanarts »

I'd go quickbuild if I could. I already built an RV-4. If I could get past all the riveting I sure would. The reason I'm going slow-build is that's all I can afford. Actually, I'm not even sure I can afford the slow build. :roll:
Scott VanArtsdalen
Token Heretic
Nirvana Rodeo / Dudek Universal
S-6ES N612SV - GONE but not forgotten
RV-4 N311SV - SOLD

User avatar
JohnR
Class B
Posts: 1081
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: Iowa

Post by JohnR »

Slow build for me. Dollars played in to it quite a bit. Also I really wanted to be able ot say I built the whole plane. Of course it is a kit and predriled but still I like the idea of understanding how the whole thing is put together.

I like the riveting. The only part I really don't enjoy is the priming and the prep for it. I do feel good about priming it though as I'm not sure where the plane will live in the future. Maybe here in Iowa, maybe elsewhere.

I will say that right now with the fuselage all clecoed together I don't look forward to tearing it all down, deburring, countersinking, and priming but once it is done I will be glad I did it. :mrgreen:
JohnR
RV-7A - Fuselage - SOLD, just not supposed to be
Numbers 6:24 - The LORD bless thee, and keep thee

User avatar
dons
Class C
Posts: 873
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:28 pm
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Post by dons »

I went SB more for the learning experience than anything else. I have spent my whole life designing/building things (and taking them apart), so the more I know about the insides the more comfortable I will be doing things on the airplane. If I ever were to build a second one, I think I would go QB.

I also agree with John about the priming, if I wasn't going to be flying the thing in the clouds and to the coast, I wouldn't be doing nearly as much. BTW John, I like the prehistoric squirrel too, I actually watched the 'meltdown' the day before you changed avatars. He would make a great airplane builder, gets his teeth into something and just won't let go.
Don Sinclair
CYKF
RV-7A (Fuselage)

User avatar
JohnR
Class B
Posts: 1081
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: Iowa

Post by JohnR »

dons wrote:If I ever were to build a second one, I think I would go QB.

I also agree with John about the priming, if I wasn't going to be flying the thing in the clouds and to the coast, I wouldn't be doing nearly as much. BTW John, I like the prehistoric squirrel too, I actually watched the 'meltdown' the day before you changed avatars. He would make a great airplane builder, gets his teeth into something and just won't let go.
I agre that if I built a second one I would strongly consider a QB. Once I know what is in there and how it's put together I don;t need to see it twice. :wink:

Don, Scrat may go for a ride on my VS, we're not sure yet. I like his tenacity and he just reminds me of real life. You just can't ever give up. :)
JohnR
RV-7A - Fuselage - SOLD, just not supposed to be
Numbers 6:24 - The LORD bless thee, and keep thee

User avatar
Gregg Swartley
Class G
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Bowmansville, PA

Slow build

Post by Gregg Swartley »

Ilove building and would not want to do anything to deprive myself of the fun of building.

Spike
Chief Rivet Banger
Posts: 4013
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:40 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Post by Spike »

Amen to that Gregg. Sometimes I just want it done, but theres nothing like seeing a completed part/assembly that I did myself!
http://www.rivetbangers.com - Now integrating web and mail!
Current Build: 2 years into a beautiful little girl

User avatar
papakeith
Class D
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:15 pm
Location: Rhode Island
Contact:

Post by papakeith »

this poll needs a fourth choice! :lol:
-------
RB's #1 heretic
www.bearhawk949.com

User avatar
Brantel
Class B
Posts: 1030
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:23 pm
Location: Newport, TN

Post by Brantel »

Standard build for no reason but money! I don't dislike building but if I could have skipped all the repetitive task, I would in a heart beat. I am really looking forward to the systems, avionics and engine install! (Don't have a clue how I am going to pay for it at this time.)
Brantel (Brian Chesteen),
RV12-IS, #121606, N912BC - Building Now!
RV10, #41942, N????? - Project Sold
RV-7/TU, #72823, N159SB - SOLD

1:1_Scale
Class D
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Central Oregon

Post by 1:1_Scale »

papakeith wrote:this poll needs a fourth choice! :lol:
Sorry PK, it looks like I can't go back and add the "Who needs a darn kit?!?" option :lol:

I've talked with two local RV owners now, and they both say that if they did it over again, they would go the QB route. They've both said that it would be money well spent, so I'm kind of surprised that no one has voted for the QB, and only one person has voted for the combination, thus far :popcorn:
Kelly
RV-7 Empennage done, wings done, fuselage to QB stage
1947 Stinson108-1 flying

User avatar
BrickPilot
Class E
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:41 am
Location: Lehi, UT

Post by BrickPilot »

Standard build. I guess the money is part of the decision, but mostly I'm in it for the glory!
Jeff Klug
Bearhawk #1053 (QB #91)
Shop cam!

User avatar
smittysrv
Class D
Posts: 287
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 7:10 am
Contact:

Post by smittysrv »

I'm a firm believer in getting therapy when you need it. Dr VanGrunsven has given me perfect pill for taking my mind off stuff that brings me down. Slow BUILD and luvin' it!!!

Bob Barrett
Class C
Posts: 625
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Sartell MN

Quickbuild

Post by Bob Barrett »

I went Quickbuild after doing the standard empenge but I have had the quickbuild since July of 2001 and I will have to speed up to get it flying in September. I am currently wiring up the instrument panel. Once that is in I have most of the hard work except putting the spinner on the prop done. You can solve some problems by planning your wiring routes while doing the standard build. However things will always change as you progress. Don't buy to far ahead!

User avatar
cjensen
Whiskey Victor
Posts: 5275
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:36 pm
Location: Green Bay, WI

Post by cjensen »

Brantel wrote: (Don't have a clue how I am going to pay for it at this time.)
:lol: You and me both buddy!! :headscratch:
Chad Jensen
Missing my RV-7...
Vertical Power support
920.216.3699
http://verticalpower.com

User avatar
RV9inIowa
Class E
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:38 pm
Location: Cedar Rapids IA

standard build = more fun

Post by RV9inIowa »

smittysrv wrote:I'm a firm believer in getting therapy when you need it. Dr VanGrunsven has given me perfect pill for taking my mind off stuff that brings me down.
Smitty's got it right.... it's Aluminum Therapy for me, slow version!

In my 2-3 year "pre-build" phase, I convinced myself that I'd go quickbuild - no questions asked - my time is worth more than $8K, blah blah blah....

Then I built the tail. That changed everything.

I've realized that I love building, especially with my heated and now newly airconditioned garage 8) . I'm sure glad I didn't go quickbuild!

dave
Dave G.
Building N149DG RV-9A Finish Kit, O-320-E2A, Dual AFS-3500
Flying the restored N3689Q, the lowest time airworthy Beech Super III.

John Courte
Class G
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 4:44 pm
Location: KSMO

QB. quicker if I can.

Post by John Courte »

I'm in it to fly, primarily, so the faster I can get in the air short of buying one, the better. I'm also a graphics geek, and my wife programmed HUDs for NASA at Ames for a while, so this will be a platform justifying the big 'EXPERIMENTAL' banner with different homebrew flight systems (redundant to primary, of course). I also chose the QB route because when the Real Job gets cranking, I sometimes don't spend more than an hour at home and awake at each end of the workday, so the time saved is well worth the extra bucks. Another benefit to the QB is that you actually spend most of the time working on something airplane-shaped instead of those initial stages where it somehow goes from a pile of aluminum to something airplane-shaped. Some folks live for that phase of the transition, and maybe when I've got more time to spare, I'll try it, but I'm happy with the QB choice for now.

User avatar
RV7Factory
Beanpolt
Posts: 522
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 2:28 pm
Location: Livermore, CA

SB

Post by RV7Factory »

Standard (slow) kit for me. Why?

Because Confusious say... "It about journey, not destination."

Confusious also say... "Man who keep feet firmly on ground have trouble putting on pants."

:mrgreen:
Brad Oliver
RV-7 | Livermore, CA
RV7Factory.com
Image

1:1_Scale
Class D
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Central Oregon

Post by 1:1_Scale »

Any idea where the extra 2% is being stashed? :? PapaKeith, are you hording percentage points?? :rofl:
Kelly
RV-7 Empennage done, wings done, fuselage to QB stage
1947 Stinson108-1 flying

Post Reply