Page 1 of 1
Looks like we are back ...
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:00 pm
by Spike
We lost about 2 days worth of postings. Sorry about that, got caught with the pants down. Let me know if you guys have any functionality problems.
-- John
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:14 pm
by captain_john
Dammit!
I was seriously JONESING!!!
Tell me, one weird thing was that the picture linking still worked. Looks like Patti didn't drop the ball!
Why was that? Different server?

CJ
Looks like we are back ...
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:15 pm
by Spike
Do you mean that you could still get to the gallery?
Tell me, one weird thing was that the picture linking still worked. Looks like Patti didn't drop the ball!
Why was that? Different server?

CJ
Submitted via email
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:21 pm
by captain_john
Yes, the pics were still being served. I found some that I posted elsewhere that were alive and well!

CJ
Looks like we are back ...
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:29 pm
by Spike
Ahhh, the short answer is that we had the galleries up and running well before the bbs. I think the galleries were up and running by Monday night. It took a few extra days to get the bbs itself up as I had to configure the new database, restore it, as well as rebuild PHP and get the cgi stuff up and running.
I've got some new hardware coming that should help solidify us and hopefully give us a speed boost, though the current new server seems pretty quick.
-- John
Yes, the pics were still being served. I found some that I posted elsewhere that were alive and well!

CJ
Submitted via email
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:16 am
by svanarts
What happened? You didn't get hit by that PHP worm did you?
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 6:57 am
by Spike
No, we had a sector of the HD go bad in the swap partition. It caused a kernel panic and a few days worth of subsequent work

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 11:16 am
by spikescopilot
spike wrote:No, we had a sector of the HD go bad in the swap partition. It caused a kernel panic and a few days worth of subsequent work

Note to self: Never trust RAID.
Looks like we are back ...
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 11:21 am
by Spike
That is correct, though it is a very useful tool. It is *NOT* a replacement for regular backups though. By the way, if anyone cares, the new hardware for the site was just delivered.
-- Spike
spike wrote: No, we had a sector of the HD go bad in the swap partition. It caused a kernel panic and a few days worth of subsequent work
Note to self: Never trust RAID.
Submitted via email
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:14 pm
by svanarts
Cool! I'm a nerd. I build servers for a living. I'd like to know. Whadya' get?

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:46 pm
by Spike
Its homegrown, a regular newegg.com special
Pentium 4, 2.8 GHz, 512Kb on board, 800MHz bus.
1 GB DDR 400
80 GB SATA HW RAID 1
Gb ether (though I dont think our new provider will be able to keep up with that)
I will most likely load up some distribution of Linux, Fedora most likely. I was originally thinking of FreeBSD but I think that I dont want that level of tinkering on a box that I want to put on the edge and forget about.
Since you are a server type, I could use some help if you know something that may help. I am looking to build this puppy into a 1U rackmount, which is a first for me as Ive only down desktops before, and its been a while at that too. Obviously its cheaper to host a 1U than it is a 2U or tower. Do you know of any good rackmount case suppliers that are reasonably priced or you have had good results with?
-- John
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 8:10 am
by bmurrish
Newegg is a pretty good place to do business with. It's hard to beat their prices and they actually have pretty decent customer service.
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:07 am
by spikescopilot
This "new" server seems a lot faster than the one that blew up.... can't wait to see how fast it gets when we're on our
own server.
