Fuel line fitting - RV7 accident N611E

Post Reply
User avatar
A2022
Class B
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2022 8:52 am
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Contact:

Fuel line fitting - RV7 accident N611E

Post by A2022 »

be careful about those small alum fuel line fittings. recommend steel... anytime you work on a fuel system, put on your slow down "working fuel system hat". otherwise, you will probably get a wrecked airplane and a trip to the hospital.

I also noted there were 5 RVs that ran out of fuel last year. there are no excuses (other than being stupid) and if you survive it will haunt you forever and everyone else will know about it. the goal for stating it like this is to keep you alive. it's like going to church.

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/ ... 102615/pdf

Analysis

During the previous flight, the experimental, amateur-built airplane lost total engine power, and the pilot, who was the builder of the airplane, completed a successful forced landing with no damage to the airplane. He found that the fuel pressure adapter “t”-fitting, used to attach the fuel pressure line, had disconnected from the fuel pump elbow fitting. The automotive adapter fitting was adopted during the airplane’s construction for fitment in a confined space and did not allow for measured torque application. The pilot reattached the fitting with a modified and shortened 5/8” spanner wrench for the 11/16” b-nut. The pilot departed the forced landing site and landed successfully at his destination.

The accident flight was the airplane’s next flight. Minutes after takeoff, the airplane once again experienced a loss of fuel pressure and a total loss of engine power. During the subsequent forced landing, the pilot sustained minor injuries and the airplane was substantially damaged. Post-accident examination of the airplane revealed that the same fuel pump elbow fitting was disconnected from the adapter fitting.

Examination of the adapter revealed that its material was soft relative to materials used in Air Force-Navy (AN) standard fittings. As a result, the shoulder on the adapter body could have been deformed under the pressure of the retaining ring even when applying minimum torque values suggested for AN standard fittings made of aluminum alloys specified in military specification. This deformation may have inhibited the proper frictional resistance in the threads to prevent the nut from backing off in service. Additionally, the body of the adapter fitting tended to rotate when applying torque to the nut. If the body was not properly secured while torque was applied to the nut during field repairs, the twisting of the adapter fitting body could have produced stresses in the attached hoses in the assembly that may have worked to rotate the adapter fitting and nut in the loosening direction during operation.....
Steve Melton
N531EM, RV9A, Superior O-320, WW 200RV prop, Slick mags, CHT 330F, EGT 1300F, B&C, 1200+ hours
Freedom and Democracy are all that really matter.
Ride a bike, unlock the world.
https://www.rvplasticparts.com/
https://www.gpsdock1.com/

Post Reply