Okay, I received my copy of the 24 years of the RVator today, and I flipped straight to the article on the RV-8 formerly known as "Fraklinstine".
So, first of all..."Franklinstine". This nickname came about from the installation of the engine. With nothing ever enginneered for this engine intall for an RV, it was a major headache for Phil (the man in charge of the installation). The nickname had nothing to do with the engine technology, or the flying qualities of the airplane.
Second...weight. It had an empty weight of 1130 pounds, and the engine itself was almost identical to a 200hp Lyc (actually 3 pounds lighter). So, saying it was heavy was true at the time of thousand pound RV-6's with IO-320's in them. A quick calculation from Dan's WB page show's the average weight of today's RV-7 is just a touch over 1100 pounds. So, 1130 is pretty close to average, even though "technically" heavy by a few pounds.
Third...performance. I'm not sure why Van's decided to abandon the idea of this engine (other than the fact that they sell new OEM Lycomings). The performance was BETTER than the 200hp Lyc in a side by side fly off. Not by much, but it was better, and the installation was a better value dollar-wise. Rate of climb solo with Van at the controls was an earsplitting
2850fpm vs. 2700fpm for the same airframe IO-360 Lyc. Max cruise at 8,000' was 217mph, 5mph higher than the Lyc.
Fourth...smoothness. Once the prop was balanced (they didn't say what prop they had on it, but I assume a constant speed since a governor is mentioned in the article), Van said "it is noticeably smoother than the 4 cylinder Lycoming, particularly at certain sweet spots."
And fifth...the SOUND!!!
I remain interested at this point, especially if I can work with someone to develop FWF stuff for it. I've talked to the guy in Poland that has the rights to the manufacturing, and they will be purchasing a flying RV-? later this year to engineer something. The engines are $18,000 BRAND NEW!!
