OOPS! dimpled not machined

A forum in which to discuss topics that are not specific to a particular series of aircraft (ie. how to cut alclad)
Post Reply
User avatar
jim_geo
Class C
Posts: 843
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: KCVO

OOPS! dimpled not machined

Post by jim_geo »

I guess any question on this board is esoteric in it's nature. I just feel that this one really qualifies. I have managed; in a fit of jump ahead and git r done, to dimple the left elevator part #606PP top flange. That would be the trim tab rear elevator spar. The written plans state that this part is to be machine counter sunk on the top flange only. So my question is this. Is there any reason, other than that's not the way it's supposed to be done, that I cant machine counter sink the trim tab hinge instead? The only problem I see is that it will be harder to line the trailing edge of the tab up with the rest of the elevator since I will be resting the hinge on dimples while drilling it rather than a flat surface. I'm thinking if no one out there knows of some special circumstance I would machine counter sink a shim and use it for the initial line up of the hinge then discard that shim after lining up is finished.

User avatar
captain_john
Sparky
Posts: 5880
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:17 am
Location: KPYM

Post by captain_john »

I don't see anything wrong with cs'ing the hinge. It is plenty thick enough.

As far as aligning the hinge, clamping it and drilling it with reasonable accuracy goes...

I would use the skin as a guide without the spar in place, so it doesn't wobble around like you explained. Maybe sandwiching it between the skin and spar just for drilling purposes would be best?

Image

Depending on how much material is left after the countersinking procedure is done, you may want to back it up with a sheet of .020 perhaps?

Confirm all this stuff with someone much smarter than me before you do anything!

:) CJ
RV-7
Garmin G3X with VP-X & a TMX-IO-360 with G3i
It's all over but the flying! 800+ hours in only 3 years!

User avatar
cjensen
Whiskey Victor
Posts: 5275
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:36 pm
Location: Green Bay, WI

Post by cjensen »

i read an article recently that had to do with dimpling when c-sinking should have been used. it would work the metal a little more, but could you use the flush sets to flatten 'em back out?? that spar is fairly thick, but it would be work hardened somewhat. :?
Chad Jensen
Missing my RV-7...
Vertical Power support
920.216.3699
http://verticalpower.com

Spike
Chief Rivet Banger
Posts: 4013
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:40 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Post by Spike »

Hmmm, Ive always run with the thought that dimpling is *always* better than C-sinking if the assembly will still fit. Dimpling leaves more material for more strength, and the flip side is that C-sinking is potentially risky.
http://www.rivetbangers.com - Now integrating web and mail!
Current Build: 2 years into a beautiful little girl

mustang
Class E
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:14 pm
Location: Kamloops, B.C. Canada

Post by mustang »

Well, you are right to think of the alignment problems arising from the pre-dimpling. I had problems with the hinge alignment without the dimpling. It seems difficult to get it all clamped together and still laying on a flat surface to get the trim tab trailing edge aligned with the rest of the elevator. I blew it the first go-around and threw the hinge out and bought another one, starting fresh. The second one worked out OK.

Cheers, Pete
Peter Marshall
Newbie RV-8 builder.

You wanna draw, ....against the fastest rivet gun in the West??? LOL

Post Reply