pat wrote:Hey Brantel while the carnivores discuss eating raw meat at the Otter can you tell us why you picked the G3X over AFS, GRT et al.
Pat
Oh it is not raw, only mostly raw...I have to honestly say however that is the best Prime Rib I have ever had! I am ready for mine again this year right now!
Dynon is still catching up to the game. The Skyview is an amazing platform hardware wise and eventually it will have most of the features of the other guys. It is bright, clear, high res and has an awesome look and feel to it. It has the highest terrain resolution out there. However, I can't stand the fact that they left no upgrade path for the guys with the legacy stuff. The only thing that works with both systems is the AP servos and even for them, you need to add more wires to get them to work. Then you have the fact that they put the ADAHRS on the DSAB bus. My experience is that the DSAB bus is not reliable enough in an aircraft environment to be used this way. Now I know they have dual buses and all but the types of things that can take down the DSAB bus are the types of things that most likely will kill both of them at the same time. They also went and put the AHRS in the same box as the Magnetometer. This means that more hoses must be ran thru the airplane and more weight added to the tail. They also will not integrate with third party AP's and still have not added any sort of vertical coupling modes to their built in AP. There are some personal reasons I parted ways with them as well but I will keep that to myself.
GRT was never in the running for me because at the time I was making my decision, they had not released their latest and greatest yet. Even still I am not sure I like the way they are overlaying stuff on their main display at this time. GRT makes some awesome stuff but their graphics have always looked like an 80's arcade game. It looks like they are improving that however. It is time for GRT to retire the EIS box and replace it with something more modern. To be honest at the time I thought GRT was in trouble since one of the large avionics dealers made mention that they did not even send them any demo gear for Airventure 2012. Looking at the situation now however it seems that they were doing fine. If I had known what I know now and the HXr had been shipping, I might have took a long hard look at GRT.
MGL is too far outside the box for me. Rainier is an awsome person and must be a real Einstein but their stuff is just different. It apparently works fine and lots of people like it. I just don't know enough about their stuff...
AFS is the exotic sports car of the experimental avionics. There are a few things that they don't do yet as it relates to the fine integration with the GNS/GTN series GPS's but it won't take Rob and his team long to figure it out. They are some smart dudes! His gear is amazing and he knows what the end user wants and needs because he gets out there and flys the software himself. AFS was a close second to my choice. I was already invested somewhat with Garmin and I sort of like the three smaller portrait type screens a little better than two big screens and that is what sealed the deal for me. I was . close to going with AFS however.
Garmin has been nothing but a pleasure to work with. Ever since Garmin created the Sport Aviation/Experimental team within, they have been like a totally different company. Steve and Matt are top notch guys and they know what the homebuilder wants and needs and they have the know how and resources to make it happen. The G3X system along with the GDL39, GTX23ES and the GTN650 is simply amazing as a complete system. Who knows better how to integrate to a GTN box other than Garmin themselves? They are also blazing the way with this ADS-B out stuff and have been doing some really neat stuff with that. Garmin listened to their customers and radically lowered their prices once they figured out they were in this market to stay. If you really get an accurate quote and you go apples to apples, they are just as competitive as any of the other guys. They have even created new database packages to lower the cost of ownership long term. Steve answers questions at all hours on the forums and will follow up to make sure you are happy. Matt is the guy writing the code so if you don't like something, you can talk directly to him about it. The G3X hardware is a very nice piece of engineering and is basically the G300 system that was made just for the Cessna Skycatcher. The manuals are all written to the certified level and are as complete and as detailed as they get. The whole system just works and works well.
The bottom line is that all of these guys make amazing systems and I doubt anyone can go wrong with any of their latest offerings. Dynon still is lagging behind a little bit.
Here is a list of things that I really wanted my new panel to have:
Full dual band ADS-B IN and a 1090ES enabled mode S transponder
Full integration with the GNS/GTN series WAAS GPS's including drawing all the flightplan, procedure turn and holding info on the map from the GPS.
Synthetic vision
Geo referenced approach plates
IFR charts
Airways
Tight integration with a third party autopilot with full coupled approach capability both LPV and VOR/LOC/GS
Velocity Vector/Flight Path Indicator
Tight integration with the VP-X Pro
EMS system that uses the new solid state pressure sensors
A manufacturer that fixes bugs quickly, takes advice and recommendations from their customers, and post manual updates at the same time they post updates
A manufacturer that is in it for the long haul and that has the resources to stay around for a long time
I am sure that there is more but that is what I can come up with off the top of my head...